Month: March 2013

Middle Tennessee’s Tourney Chances


In what could be one of the most unfortunate bubble stories in recent memory, Middle Tennessee came up short in the Sun Belt semis against Florida International.  Immediately, pundits were writing them off and saying how it was a good run but it was over.  But is it really over?  Here at Crotistics, it is our responsibility to dig a little deeper and see how a team truly performed.

After last night’s loss, Middle Tennessee fell from #21 to #25 in my rankings.  Yes, despite the loss, MTSU is still in my overall top 25.  For reference, my highest ranked team last year to not make the tournament was #41 Arizona.  My rankings are a combination of W/L strength, SOS, Margin of Victory and Home Advantage.  I’m aware that these rankings are subjective, but I think this is a point in MTSU’s favor.

W/L strength is an interesting metric, which corrects for a weak or strong schedule played.  For every win, you get positive points.  The tougher the team, the more points you get.  In 2013, there are 347 teams.  Beating the #1 ranked team is worth 347, while beating the #347 team is worth 1.  The losses work in reverse.  Losing to #347 = -347 points.  The average of all game points is a teams Win Strength.  MTSU currently ranks #38 in this category.

With regards to the Strength of Schedule argument, the only at-large bid that entered the tournament with a worse SOS than Middle Tennessee is Iona.  Iona also had a worse record and lower margin of victory than MTSU.

But perhaps the most comparable 2012 case to this year’s MTSU team is VCU.  VCU won the Colonial tournament and received a #12 seed.  Whether their resume would have been good enough for an at-large with a loss in the CAA title game is up for debate, but let’s look at their actual resume.  VCU finished the season 28-6.  Middle Tennessee is 28-5.  VCU’s win strength was #38.  MTSU’s win strength is #38.  MTSU’s Margin of Victory is actually 3 points higher than VCU’s was last year, which is pretty impressive.  They rank 8th in the nation.  MTSU also has won 13 games away from home.  Last year VCU had 12 wins away from home.  Additionally, MTSU’s schedule this year is slightly more difficult than VCU’s last year.

So what does this tell us?  These teams are extremely comparable.  Even though Middle Tennessee is lacking “top 100” wins, they have 4 wins that are right outside the top 100, which still count for something.  Their record is virtually identical.  Their W/L Strength is identical.  MTSU has played a more difficult schedule, and in doing so beaten its opponents by more.  From a selection standpoint, Middle Tennessee has the advantage.  VCU was a #12 seed last year, and I don’t think Middle Tennessee will be disappointed when the brackets are released this Sunday.


Is Louisiana Tech in the NCAA Tournament?

Head Coach Michael White


In creating my inaugural Bubble Watch today, I came across the strange anomaly that is Louisiana Tech.  This week the Bulldogs are ranked #27 in the AP Poll and #28 in the Coaches Poll.  They have a 25-3 record against D-1 competition, and yet they are nowhere to be found in my bracket projection.  My rankings and bracket don’t inherently show bias to any teams, so I really don’t have anything personally against Louisiana Tech.  I actually think they’re a very good team.  Their pressure team surely would give teams fits in the tournament, and if they are to make it, they should be a 12 or 13, with a 14 at absolute worst.

So what gives?  Why is Louisiana Tech not in my bracket, while they are in virtually everyone else’s?  The reason is that the two toughest games Louisiana Tech will play all season, they haven’t played yet.  Their first test is Thursday night at New Mexico St.  They’re an underdog in that game.  Additionally, they finish up the regular season at Denver, and they will be an underdog in that game as well.  The Bulldogs still have a chance at a perfect conference season, but it won’t be easy.

In the WAC tournament, they will need to win 3 games to earn the league’s automatic bid.  Given that the Bulldogs will be underdogs in the next two games, assuming one win and one loss is appropriate.  That puts their record at 26-4.  If they can then get to the finals and come up short, the committee has a team on their hands who would be 28-5, with only one real bad loss at McNeese St.  I think 28 wins gets you in.  I don’t think 27 will be enough.  27 would either mean a loss before the WAC finals or losses in the final two regular season games.

This all can be avoided by winning the WAC Tournament, but this is even a more interesting case than Drexel last year.  Louisiana Tech’s Strength of Schedule is absolutely brutal for an at-large contender.  They’ve played only 9 games thus far against teams ranked in my top 175!  You have to challenge yourself out of conference and Drexel was punished for it last year.  It’s truly amazing to me that despite 25 wins, the fate of the Bulldogs season will be decided over the course of just 10 days.  They have the opportunity to prove they belong.